<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>CFHS Speech & Debate</title>
		<link>http://cfhsdebate.forumotion.net/feed/?</link>
		<description>Latest topics</description>
		<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:59:26 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>10</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Some statistics and articles about child predadation</title>
			<link>http://cfhsdebate.forumotion.net/december-topic-discussion-f15/some-statistics-and-articles-about-child-predadation-t10.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Mattscout007</dc:creator>
			<description>Yeah, I actually found stuff. If anyone cares, here it is. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/05/21/myspace_offender_data/



Some highlights are the actual statistics: 7,000 MySpace profiles the site has removed after linking them to people convicted of sex crimes...news accounts from last year reported more than 100 criminal incidents of adults using MySpace &quot;to prey or attempt to prey on children.&quot;



Maybe more to come. </description>
			<category>December Topic Discussion</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:59:26 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://cfhsdebate.forumotion.net/december-topic-discussion-f15/some-statistics-and-articles-about-child-predadation-t10.htm#13</comments>
			<guid>http://cfhsdebate.forumotion.net/december-topic-discussion-f15/some-statistics-and-articles-about-child-predadation-t10.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The right to vote is inalienable</title>
			<link>http://cfhsdebate.forumotion.net/pros-f9/the-right-to-vote-is-inalienable-t7.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Ryan(Coach)</dc:creator>
			<description>This is from a recent question I was asked. Why is voting inalienable? this is used to affirm the resolution using the Rawlsian Social Contract (esoteric philosophy)





First he has some basic assumptions,



1. There exists a &quot;Social Contract&quot; between persons.

2. These persons need to agree (metaphorically, not in real life) to the contract.

3. In order for this agreement to be just, there must be UNANIMOUS consent.

4. No rational human being would consent to something  ...</description>
			<category>Pros</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 00:08:30 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://cfhsdebate.forumotion.net/pros-f9/the-right-to-vote-is-inalienable-t7.htm#9</comments>
			<guid>http://cfhsdebate.forumotion.net/pros-f9/the-right-to-vote-is-inalienable-t7.htm</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>